Friday, November 29, 2019

My Reason Why I Want to Go to OCC free essay sample

I crave for changed this year. I wanted to tried new things and be different. My life before I found Jesus this year was dark. I saw no hope, I cried every day, and I pretend. But not anymore because I finally know what God has done for me and what he plans to for me. The reasons why I want to go to Ozark Christian College is my desire to grow, the Lupus, and to help others. My first reason for wanting to be apart of Ozark is because I want to keep continuing to grow closer to God and Jesus. I want to be able to walk father in my following of Christ. I started my faith walk five months ago, the spring of last year I almost tried to commit suicide because everything was falling apart. My health, social life, and home life was horrible. When I started my senior year I wanted change. We will write a custom essay sample on My Reason Why I Want to Go to OCC or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page I was tired of living in my illnesse’s shadow, I was tired of being afraid and, not being confident. So this year I decide to be apart of all of the activities that junior ROTC had to offered. I joined drill team and rifle team. Being in those teams I made friends who are really confident in their faith. I really wanted that. I started going to their church. Which I’m so glad that accepted their offered because I know a lot more about God and Jesus then I do now. I feel like since I started my walk, I’m so more confident. I haven’t been to that dark place once this year. And when I do feel like I’m slipping back I’ll talk to my friends, I’ll bible study, and I’ll pray My second reason for wanting to go to Ozark is because knowing first hand what it’s like living with a chronic illness. Since I found God and Jesus I want tell people not to give up. I want to help people find their light again. I want to tell them that,â€Å"There’s a guy that loves you for who you are, even if made unforgettable mistakes. He will accept you and take away the pain. His name is Jesus and all you need to do is ask forgiveness, pray, and believe.† Living with Lupus, I always had to depend on people to help me and I want to help this time! I hope that when I tell people about my struggles with Lupus and how I have faith now. They will see that there is hope in this world because of man that created them and another man that died for them. My last reason why I want to go to Ozark is because I’m very interested in the deaf ministry program. My six year old brother has non-verbal autism. He has really difficult time speaking and expressing his feelings. I read online that teaching autistic kids sign language help them communicate and know words. Ever since I teach him simple words like â€Å"eat†,â€Å"drink†, and â€Å"I love you† he has spoke a lot better.I want to be apart of deaf ministry so I can help people with all kinds disabilities and help them start their walk with God. Because I have Lupus and my own disabilities, I think I would be more better helping people with disabilities because I know how it feels. I want to go to OCC for my desire to grow more closer, my illness, and to help people. My future for after OCC is to either be a special education teacher or be a sign language interpreter. I don’t know what I want to do yet, but I know three things for sure: I want to help people, I want to show the love of Jesus to people, and God had a plan for me no matter what and I believe in that.

Monday, November 25, 2019

Overpopulation as a Social Problem Essay Example

Overpopulation as a Social Problem Essay Example Overpopulation as a Social Problem Paper Overpopulation as a Social Problem Paper With these shocking embers in mind, it is not hard to believe that overpopulation is an issue in the world today, effecting countries on nearly every continent. For the record, overpopulation is not a complete concrete concept; many different opinions exist in determining criteria for overpopulation and deciding which countries should be labeled overpopulated. However in this paper, the following questions concerning overpopulation will be addressed in hopes of developing a better understanding of overpopulation and how it affects many countries of the world: What is overpopulation? Where are some places in the oral that are heavily overpopulated? Why is overpopulation a social problem? What are some solutions that have been carried out to address overpopulation? What is overpopulation? In referring to human population, overpopulation occurs when the population of a country, city, or area exceeds the amount of resources available in that area during a given time period. In other words, the concept of overpopulation not only depends on the size of the population, but the ratio of population to sustainable resources available (Overpopulation, 201 1). Overpopulation also depends on the way that resources are used and strutted throughout the population, large or small. For example, very low population areas like desert or arctic areas can be considered overpopulated if the amount of resources available is not enough to sustain human life. Essentially, overpopulation affects resources on two different levels: basic life sustaining resources and quality of life resources. An area can be primarily considered overpopulated if resources such as clean water, clean air, food, shelter, and warmth are in shortage, but areas can also be considered overpopulated if certain quality of life resources are in question, such as deiced care, education, clean sewage treatment, and waste disposal (Overpopulation, 2011). Where are some places in the world that are heavily overpopulated? The Optimum Population Trust, which is a British organization that advocates population control in the United Kingdom, produced an overpopulation index that ranks countries Of the world by assessing three different primary criteria: per capita consumption (ecological footprint) versus per capita biologically productive capacity (measured in global hectares per capita), self-sufficiency versus dependency, and actual population versus sustainable population. According to this index, the ten most overpopulated countries of the world are Singapore, Israel, Kuwait, Korea Republic, Jordan, united Arab Emirates, Japan, Lebanon, Iraq, and Belgium. Although China and India are two of the most typically conceived overpopulated countries, they respectively rank 29th and 33rd on the index because they are marginally less dependent on other countries for resources (Overpopulation index, 2010). The Optimum Population Trust states that this helps to demonstrate that overpopulation is not just a matter of population size or density. Why is overpopulation a social problem? The lack of resources that defines overpopulation makes overpopulation a social problem and leads to other social problems. The most obvious result of overpopulation is in land usage. Close to 90% of the worlds food is produced on land. The more land that is required for living decreases the amount of land that can be used for production. Land is a limited resource and will eventually run out. Other essential resources such as food, water, and shelter also become limited as humans use of land increases. Since these resources are no longer available to everybody in surplus; malnutrition, dehydration, ND starvation become worse problems as population increases. These limited resources then increase crime rates as people struggle to get necessary supplies to survive. High population in confined areas also increases the amount of pollution, lowers the living conditions, and decreases personal freedom (Overpopulation, 2011 Several people argue that overpopulation is not a social problem. One claim references the fact that the entire world population could relocate to the United States and the population density would be less than 2,000 people per square mile. When this population density is compared to larger united States cities that are typically home to around 1 0,000 people per square mile, the claim is made that the United States alone has sufficient resources for the world population and that overpopulation is not a problem on a global scale. This claim is made under the false belief that land and population density are the only factors that are affected by overpopulation (Williams, 1999). With 2,000 people per square mile, there would be no room for enough food production and massive levels of starvation would exist. The amount of available fresh water in America would be another overpopulation problem caused by this scenario. North America is currently home to about of the worlds fresh water and does not have enough to supply to everybody in the world at a sustainable rate (Posted, Daily, ; Earlier, 1996). The Population Research Institute makes the claim that overpopulation is a myth and increased population leads to a greater increase in production(Overpopulation is a myth, 2010). While population increases have increased living conditions in developed countries that can produce or maintain sufficient resources, this idea vastly simplifies the problems that overpopulation can cause. As mentioned previously, overpopulation is a robber because of limited resources. Since every resource in the world is limited the sustainable population also has a limit. This means that at some population point the world as a whole will consume more than they produce. This is already happening In several countries, including the United States, where local overcompensation is forcing the import of foreign goods to maintain a healthy society. The most overpopulated countries in the world have a mix of developed countries that have the ability to import the large amount of resources that cannot be produced and poor countries that do not have these capacities. The common theme is that these countries cannot produce sustainable amounts necessary resources and must import items to maintain a healthy living environment (Overpopulation, 2011). Trade is a zero sum gain and countries that have high imports must be offset by countries that have large amounts of excess resources to exports. When the excess resources in these countries disappear, the sustainability of these overpopulated countries will also disappear and the social problems will be undeniable. What solutions have been carried out to address overpopulated areas? While there is no sure solution to overpopulation, measures have been oaken to address the issue and limit the negative stresses that it places on the world. Two common solutions that have been carried out to address overpopulated areas are the concept of sustainability and curbing reproduction rates. As previously stated, overpopulation occurs when the available in that area during a given time period. The concept of sustainability focuses on the second part of that definition: the amount of resources available in that area. An attempt to curb reproduction rates focuses on the first part of that definition: the population of a country, city, or area exceeds, or is in excess. While these two measures directly focus on different aspects of the overpopulation issue, they act as one to solve the problems that overpopulation creates in the world today. Firstly, sustainability is the practice of conserving resources to ensure that people will have enough resources throughout their life and the lives of future generations (Pits, 2011). Sustainability is practiced by conserving energy, resources, and materials, as well as using new technologies and attempting to monitor reproduction rates in the world. Sustainability is important to preventing a depletion of key resources in our environment cause depletion of these resources usually leads to poverty, disease, malnutrition, and sometimes death (Pits, 2011).

Friday, November 22, 2019

Natural Disasters and the Ancient Sumerians Essay - 1

Natural Disasters and the Ancient Sumerians - Essay Example These different legends and myths also involved the data concerning the location and the duration the last great floods are perceived to occur as it is the one that caused the rise and development of these narratives. Even though there is no existing evidence concerning the enormous floods that is believed to have covered almost every mountain in the world, only many narratives from all over the world that is told concerning the great floods which was the major disaster that was faced by the people of Sumerian2. The floods are considered to have destroyed the human race in the unsociable past and which resulted in the map of the world to change in the process. As a result of the floods, the Sumerians were forced to migrate and as a result of this migration, the early Mesopotamia culture was passed to the people where the Sumerians settled3. In the year 5000 BC, the floods of the Caspian Sea and the black sea occurred. The effects of the floods were greatly faced on the northern shores of the sea as in causing the water level of the Mediterranean Sea to rise. This made the red sea to connect itself to the mar Mara Sea that is located next to the modern turkey. The developing pressure that was happening in the earths crust resulted in a region that is considered to be active and of high earthquake magnitude. This is believed to have triggered some of the major earthquakes and some of the volcanic eruptions4. This was also regarded as the great floods as it is explained by the Sumerian legends, which was later hired by the civilization of the ancient Mesopotamia and was eventually recorded down in the bible. The people who managed to escape the floods relocated from these fertile lands to the Western Europe region even though many of the Sumerians went to regions that were warm which is believed to be the southern Mesopotamia region. While in the southern Mesopotamia, the Sumerians found the first humankind civilization and where their

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Research report assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Research report assignment - Essay Example xpect and accept that power is distributed unequally† (Hofstede) as exemplified in Japan manifests the recognition of inequality in power structure that reverberates in the business applications. As explicitly disclosed, â€Å"some foreigners experience Japan as extremely hierarchical because of their business experience of painstakingly slow decision making process: all the decisions must be confirmed by each hierarchical layer and finally by the top management in Tokyo† (Hofstede par. 4). Therefore, in Japan, decision-making is expected to be based on more group consensus and structural hierarchical levels are observed prior to the approval of the man on the top of the organizational structure. The dimension of individualism is construed as the â€Å"the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members† (Hofstede par. 5). It was thereby acknowledged that Japanese culture is more collectivists than individualists. In the scale that compares U.S. dimensions of culture with that of Japan, it was clearly apparent that the U.S. manifests predominance in individualism, with a score of 91 as compared to Japan’s 46. As such, the following characteristics were noted to manifest collectivism: U.S.’s 62. This is indicative of a society and culture that is â€Å"driven by competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner / best in field – a value system that starts in school and continues throughout organizational behavior† (Hofstede par. 7). Likewise, according to DHerbais, et al., â€Å"the (almost) complete absence of expressed emotion, feelings and spontaneity during interactions dominates Japanese organizations. Respect for elders in Japanese Japan scored extremely high in uncertainty avoidance (92), indicating their aversion for uncertainty. Accordingly, it is reported that it takes a lot of time for Japanese to undertake new projects due to the need to be certain of all aspects and facets that influence them. As

Monday, November 18, 2019

Small-business owner Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Small-business owner - Research Paper Example A labor-relations strategy involves identifying the goals in labor relations that are desired by both the labor and the management. They could be picked out individually or jointly. A strategy to meet these goals will then be identified (Slaughter, 2008). This could be a collaboration strategy or compliance strategy, or a combination of both collaboration and compliance (Noe, 2007). Actions necessary to carry out that strategy will then be developed. As a manager, I would motivate my employees by rewarding appropriately for the time they dedicate to the company, offering annual pay increments (Christiansen, 1983) and showing appreciation through complimenting on a job that’s been well done. Assigning a manageable amount of work to each employee would also motivate him/her to work well. Lastly, it’s important to engage in casual conversations with employees and try to learn something about every one (Noe,

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Meritocracy As An Ideology Sociology Essay

Meritocracy As An Ideology Sociology Essay Meritocracy can also refer to an idealised society where discrimination on the basis of race, nationality, gender, age, and other irrelevant characteristics is completely absent. Merit is the encompassing value, the basic and morally correct criterion for any and all social classifications, particularly in respect to socioeconomic standing and in public space. A notion, emphasising societal consensus on the means and processes of selection for particular roles through a system of sifting, sorting, and rewarding talent and ability, motivated by competition for qualifications that in turn structure access to wealth, prestige, and personal satisfaction. It is conceived as a repudiation of systems like aristocracy where individuals inherit their social status. A meritocracy resembles aristocracy in the classical sense of the term meaning rule by the best. What has happened over the centuries, however, is that aristocracy has become associated with hereditary privilege and a rigid class s ystem. Instead of this, a meritocracy promotes worthy individuals regardless of which social strata they happen to be born in and each individual has good fortune in proportion to the individuals deservingness (Rawls, 1999, Nozick 1974, Miller 1999). IQ tests primarily tap analytical, logic-based reasoning; and surely that kind of cognitive ability is related to performance in many job settings. But other kinds of cognitive ability are also related to performance and thus also represent merit. For instance: imagination, practical sense, and the ability to interpret others perspectives. By the same token, the effort component of Youngs formulation suggests that a number of personality factors may figure into a reasonable conception of merit. For example, being conscientious may enhance job performance. Of course, some individual traits and social skills may be rewarded because they reflect conformity to arbitrary group norms. It is not clear why the term merit should be identified so closely with mental ability as distinct from many other conditions and traits that improve the chances of social and economic success (Hauser et als, 2000, p. 203). David Miller (1996, 300) eluding on Walzer (1983) has indicated that a meritocracy is not only more stable but also more socially just if there are a number of socially recognised forms of merit: economic contribution would be one kind of merit, education and scholarship another, artistic achievement a third, public service yet another, and so forth. However these other conditions and traits do not contribute to a fair opportunity. In Rawls view, the correlation between ones social origins and ones outcome in life is zero in a meritocracy and as long as some form of the family exists in society fair opportunity cannot be achieved as (Rawls 1971, 64). The social context within which individuals grow up influences the achievements of equally competent persons. Success in the labour market is transmitted from parents to children, and the advantages of the children of successful parents go considerably beyond the benefits of the best education, wealth and genetic cognitive ability. Many of the criteria associated with individual talent and effort do not measure the individual in isolation but rather parallel the phenomena associated with aristocracy; what is called individual talent is actually a function of that individuals social position or opportunities gained by virtue of family and ancestry. Among these, for example, one might list ambition or drive, perseverance, responsibility, personal attractiveness, and physical or artistic skills or talents, along with access to social support and to favourable social and economic networks and resources. Access to education is partly defined by inheritance as much research has demonstrated (Bowles and Gintis, 2002; Bourdieu and Passeron 1990; Aschaffenburg and Maas 1997; Sacks, 2003; Ballantine 2001). Compiling evidence from other studies Herrnstein concludes that 80% of the differences in IQ among individuals is explained by inherited factors and 15% is explained by environmental factors (Herrnstein 1971, 171). Children from the upper class get upper class education, middle class children get middle class education, working class people get working class education, and poor people get poor education. Privileged young people can perceive reachable goals and develop lofty aspirations because they tend to benefit from high expectations and support networks from the fa mily and social milieu, as well as extensive economic and educational resources. Those who have the resources, via their parental background, will move through higher education, get well paid jobs, and postpone family plans until they are well into their thirties, building their financial and cultural capital significantly prior to family formation. Inheritance may provide access to powerful forms of social capital (who you know) and cultural capital (what you know). Bourdieu Passeron (1990) indicate that students who lack the required knowledge and skills with which to successfully navigate the parameters of middle class culture inevitably fail at school. It therefore seems that unequal educational opportunity is the driver of individual achievement. Research shows that as class rises so does the level of education. As a consequence, the expansion of higher education will broaden the gulf between rich and poor (Blanden et al. 2005). So achievement capacities are ascribed to social class. Thus, IQ tests measure intelligence as a reflection of inherent intellectual capacity combined with environmental influences. Thus parents can predispose their children to succeed or fail in life as they are a part of the environment that affect the abilities that children attain. Thus the first and foremost among non-merit factors is the effect of social class at birth on future life. Therefore truly equalizing childrens environments in an effort to create a system with equal opportunities for all would mean having to eliminate the family. Meritocracy thus could lead to a hereditary caste system that, far from promoting social mobility, actually makes social advancement nearly impossible for the lower orders. This could be the case if wealth and social position are or primarily distributed by unchangeable genetic characteristics of individuals. This argument can be reworked into the form of a Hernsteins syllogism: 1. If differences in mental abilities are inherited, and 2. If success requires those abilities, and 3. If earnings and prestige depend on success, 4. Then social standing (which reflects earnings and prestige) will be based to some extent on inherited differences among people. (Herrnstein 1971, 197-8) This implies that absolute equality of opportunity is an ideal that cannot be achieved. (Loury 1977, p. 176). For John Rawls, the question of distributive justice is rather different. He is not content to say that any person begins at some point in the process of acquisition and then is merely constrained by a set of rules and procedures to ensure fairness. Rather, the socioeconomic position of the agent is also considered. Rawls bases his query on how the agent is presented with the distribution of talents and social position. His conclusion is that these distributions are accidental and arbitrary. It is an accident that someone is born with whatever natural traits he may possess. The question is raised whether a meritocracy based on natural abilities is thus unfair. Some might contend, for example, that even if we do not deserve our natural abilities it is not unfair if we reap the rewards of those abilities because the system of reward is independent of the system of deserts. However, Rawls makes the case that social position is also random and arbitrary. The fact that natural abilities may or may not be rewarded in that society is an accident. To be rewarded based merely on an accident is not deserved. Thus, a meritocracy that is based on reward from undeserved social position is similarly unfair. Therefore, both natural abilities and social position may not be the basis of distributive justice because they are unfair. The naturally advantaged are not to gain merely because they are more gifted. The individual cannot help how she begins life. Why make her pay for her positive talents and advantages? The rectification of these disparities in Rawls is his difference principle that makes all inequalities subject to the stipulation that the least advantaged will benefit from them.

Thursday, November 14, 2019

Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere :: essays research papers

Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere, Enlightenment author and greatest comic dramatist of all times Jean-Jaques Rousseau, philosopher, novelist, composer, language and music theorist, and single most important Enlightenment writer Act I SCENE 1. Moliere and Rousseau are up in heaven R: Hey Moliere is that you? M: Yes, may I ask your name again? R: Yeah it’s Rousseau. M: Ah, it’s been a long time since I’ve seen you. Sorry, my memory doesn’t always serve me right anymore. R: No, you’ve never met me before. I just remember learning about you back when I was on earth. M: Oh, you’re Rousseau, the Romantic writer, not to mention many other hobbies. Yes I’ve heard about you. Speaking of earth, things are really screwed up nowadays. Have you seen what I’m talking about? R: Yes indeed. As a matter of fact, I was just going to check out the telescopes. M: Oh really, I haven’t been there in a while. R: Yeah, you want to join me? M: Sure, might as well. SCENE 2. Moliere and Rousseau at the telescopes R: There’s a couple right over here we can use. M: What do you want to look at? R: Let’s check out this World Masterpiece class where they’re talking about me right now. M: Sounds good to me. R: I can’t believe that. Out of all of my great literature they picked Confessions to read. That was a piece of crap I wrote just to get a few things off my chest and they’re hailing it as a World Masterpiece? M: Well, at least they’re reading some of your work. R: Whopptie doo! Why don’t they have the students read some of my real masterpieces like The Social Contract or Discourse on Inequality? M: I don’t know, why don’t they? R: Haven’t you read any of my works? M: Sorry, after leaving earth and coming to this paradise, I figured it was best to stay away from anymore earthly influence. R: Well yes, you’ve got a point there. But my point is that students aren’t reading my really good literature, like the two I mentioned earlier, for a reason. M: And what might that be? R: It’s simple, the public school systems are set up and funded(poorly) by the government. Trust me they don’t want every college student reading The Social Contract or Discourse on Inequality. They’d have every supposed â€Å"highly educated† person in America trying to overthrow the current and long-standing government. M: Ah, I see quite clearly now. R: Do you really? M: Yes of course, the government, while getting paid by these students to for education, is at the same time choosing very wisely what to teach it’s pupils so as to make them a more ideal citizen and better property of the State.